Police general ₱70,000 shoes controversy has sparked public debate after allegations surfaced that a senior police official wore footwear worth over ₱70,000 while in official uniform—raising questions about discipline, ethics, and uniform standards within the Philippine National Police (PNP).

A senior police official is facing public scrutiny after allegations surfaced that she wore shoes reportedly worth more than ₱70,000 while in official uniform—an issue that has sparked renewed debate over discipline, ethics, and standards within the Philippine National Police (PNP).

According to the National Police Commission (Napolcom), administrative complaints have been filed against Police Brigadier General Jezebel Medina, citing possible violations related to conduct unbecoming of a police officer and neglect of duty. The issue came to light following public attention on photos circulating online that appeared to show the officer wearing what netizens identified as a high-end pair of footwear during an official engagement.

Napolcom Confirms Administrative Complaints

In a press briefing on Wednesday, January 7, 2026, Napolcom Vice Chairperson and Executive Officer Rafael Vicente Calinisan confirmed that formal complaints had been lodged. He clarified that the case does not involve criminal charges at this stage but focuses on administrative accountability under existing police regulations.

Calinisan emphasized that PNP personnel, especially ranking officers, are expected to strictly adhere to uniform policies, which are designed to promote professionalism, uniformity, and public trust.

“The uniform is not just clothing—it represents discipline, authority, and public service,” Calinisan said, adding that any deviation, if proven, must be addressed through proper procedures.

Uniform Standards Under the Spotlight

The PNP has long enforced strict guidelines on what may be worn with official uniforms, including footwear. These rules aim to prevent displays that could be perceived as excessive, inappropriate, or inconsistent with the modesty expected of public servants.

While the alleged ₱70,000 price tag of the shoes has not been officially confirmed by authorities, the controversy has raised questions about how uniform regulations are enforced, particularly among high-ranking officers.

Some observers note that even the perception of luxury can affect public confidence, especially at a time when many Filipinos expect restraint and integrity from government officials.

Public Reaction and Online Debate

The incident quickly gained traction on social media, drawing mixed reactions. Some netizens criticized the alleged choice of footwear as insensitive and unbecoming, while others urged caution, stressing that facts should be verified before judgment is passed.

Supporters of due process have reminded the public that administrative investigations are meant to determine accountability fairly and without prejudice.

Due Process and Next Steps

Napolcom reiterated that the officer involved will be given the opportunity to respond to the allegations. The commission assured the public that the investigation will follow established protocols and will be conducted impartially.

If found liable, possible penalties could range from reprimand to more serious administrative sanctions, depending on the outcome of the probe and the gravity of any confirmed violations.

A Reminder on Accountability

The case serves as a reminder that public officials—regardless of rank—are bound by rules meant to uphold professionalism and public trust. As the investigation continues, authorities urge the public to allow due process to take its course.

Napolcom has not yet released a timeline for the resolution of the case.