14

By Henrylito D. Tacio

If you were a contestant in a quiz show and were asked the two questions presented at the beginning of this article, how would you answer?

The first question concerns a pregnant woman who already has eight children, some of whom suffer from disabilities. She herself has syphilis. Should she undergo an abortion?

The second question asks you to choose among three presidential candidates. One is surrounded by corrupt politicians, follows astrologers, smokes heavily, and drinks excessively. Another was removed from office twice, slept until noon, used opium during his younger years, and consumed large amounts of whiskey daily.

The third is a decorated war hero, a vegetarian, a non-smoker, a light drinker, and faithful to his wife.

Many people faced with those questions would likely answer that the woman should terminate her pregnancy and that the third candidate appears the obvious choice. Yet the revelations at the end completely change the picture. The unborn child was Ludwig van Beethoven, one of the greatest composers in history. The three candidates were Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, and Adolf Hitler.

The lesson is simple but profound: appearances, isolated facts, and incomplete information can be dangerously misleading.

That is why one of the most repeated moral teachings in human history is the warning against judging others too quickly. In the Bible, Jesus says: “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you” (Matthew 7:1-2).

Yet judging others seems to be second nature to many of us.

A glance at social media reveals how quickly people label others. One mistake, one photograph, one statement taken out of context, and verdicts are immediately handed down. Some are condemned as failures; others are praised as heroes. Frequently, these judgments are based less on facts and more on emotions, assumptions, prejudices, or personal experiences.

American poet Henry Wadsworth Longfellow captured this tendency when he observed: “We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing; others judge us by what we have done.”

The problem with judging people is that we often see only a tiny fraction of who they really are.

Consider the old German tale about a singing contest between a nightingale and a cuckoo. The nightingale’s song was rich and beautiful, filling the forest with melody. A donkey was chosen as judge. As the nightingale sang, the donkey listened with a blank expression.

Then came the cuckoo’s simple two-note call.

Immediately, the donkey nodded approvingly. He understood that song. After all, “cuckoo, cuckoo” sounded much closer to “hee-haw, hee-haw” than the nightingale’s complex melody.

Not surprisingly, the donkey declared the cuckoo the winner.

The story is humorous, but it carries an uncomfortable truth. We often evaluate people according to our own limited understanding. We prefer what is familiar. We admire qualities we recognize and sometimes dismiss qualities we cannot appreciate.

As someone wisely observed, “We all judge according to our own limited perceptions, our biases, and our varying degrees of ignorance.”

The Roman philosopher Seneca echoed the same thought centuries ago. “A man who examines the saddle and bridle and not the animal itself when he is out to buy a horse is a fool,” he wrote. “Similarly, only an absolute fool values a man according to his clothes, or according to his position.”

In today’s world, judging by outward appearance remains common. We size people up by their clothes, profession, educational attainment, skin color, accent, social status, or political affiliation. We create categories and place people inside them. Once labeled, they often struggle to escape the boxes we create for them.

Yet life repeatedly demonstrates how unreliable these judgments can be.

A man taking a walk one day noticed someone working in his garden while sitting in a chair. The observer immediately thought, “What a lazy person.”

Then he noticed a pair of crutches leaning beside the chair.

The gardener was disabled but determined to remain productive despite his physical limitations.

That moment dramatically changed the observer’s perspective. The apparent laziness was actually perseverance. The supposed weakness was really courage.

He later reflected that the lesson remained with him for years: the burdens people carry are rarely visible.

How often do we encounter a person who seems irritable without knowing that he has spent sleepless nights caring for a sick spouse? How often do we criticize someone for being withdrawn without realizing she is struggling with depression? How often do we assume a person lacks ambition when he is already working multiple jobs just to feed his family?

The truth is that every individual is fighting battles that others cannot see.

William George Jordan expressed this beautifully: “We know nothing of the trials, sorrows and temptations of those around us, of pillows wet with sobs, of the life-tragedy that may be hidden behind a smile.”

Indeed, behind every face is a story.

Some stories involve grief.

Others involve heartbreak.

Still others involve sacrifices that remain unnoticed by the world.

When we rush to judgment, we add another burden to people who may already be carrying more than we can imagine.

This does not mean that we should abandon discernment. There is an important difference between judging actions and condemning people. Society needs standards. Wrongdoing must be addressed. Harmful behavior cannot simply be ignored.

What we should avoid is the arrogant assumption that we know everything about a person’s character based on limited information.

Humility requires acknowledging that our understanding is incomplete.

French novelist Honoré de Balzac learned this lesson in an unforgettable way.

Balzac enjoyed analyzing handwriting and believed he could accurately determine a person’s character from it. One day, an elderly woman presented him with a school notebook and asked him to evaluate the child’s potential.

After carefully studying the messy handwriting, Balzac confidently declared that the child was probably careless and unintelligent and unlikely to achieve much in life.

The elderly woman then smiled.

The notebook, she explained, had actually belonged to Balzac himself when he was a schoolboy.

Suddenly, the expert judge found himself judged by his own standards.

The story reminds us that the same flaws we condemn in others can often be found in ourselves. We are quick to notice another person’s shortcomings while overlooking our own. We scrutinize others through a magnifying glass and ourselves through a forgiving lens.

Perhaps that is why compassion is a better guide than condemnation.

When we choose understanding over judgment, relationships improve. Families become stronger. Friendships deepen. Communities become kinder places to live.

Empathy enables us to ask questions before reaching conclusions. It encourages us to listen before criticizing. It teaches us to see people not as stereotypes or labels but as fellow travelers facing the same uncertainties and struggles that we ourselves experience.

In the end, judging people solely by appearances is like reading only the cover of a book and pretending to know the entire story.

Most human beings are far more complex than they appear.

The next time you are tempted to make a snap judgment about someone, pause for a moment. Remember Beethoven, who might never have been born if people looked only at circumstances. Remember Roosevelt and Churchill, whose imperfections did not prevent them from shaping history. Remember the gardener with the crutches and the child whose untidy handwriting belonged to a future literary giant.

Most of all, remember that every person carries a story hidden beneath the surface. And until we know that story, perhaps the wisest judgment is to withhold judgment itself.

As author Dee Dee Artner aptly said: “Judging is giving too much value to the surface and missing the value beneath.